I don’t plan on ever getting a car or a driver’s license. Once I recover, I will hop back on my bicycle and take Winnipeg Transit to get around. Past Winnipeg transportation plans have been collecting dust while failing to attempt sustainable and equitable transportation before our city is expected to reach a million people before 2035. However, the new Transportation Master Plan 2050 (TMP50 for short) offers a chance for once; we may get a transportation plan developed in our lifetime.
In a nutshell, TMP50 is Winnipeg’s transportation network plan for the next thirty years for roads, bridges, public and active transportation, sidewalks, rivers, and walkways. The report addresses four key issues Winnipeggers’ concerns about, including climate change, traffic congestion, city finances, and public safety.
The report came out with several directions, including providing more active transportation options, connecting the city with better transit, safe mobility options, and rejuvenating our road network.
My overall impression from the town hall and numerous seminars the city put on was TMP50 has lots of potential in making our town’s transportation system sustainable, efficient, and financially viable. However, it will be a grind to see the plan through from start to finish.
Winnipeg, after all, is a city like many of its North American counterparts, loves the automobile.
Consider in 2016, 78% of all trips were completed by car, 14% by transit, and 7 % by cycling and walking, creating a real challenge in hitting our climate targets.
Half of Winnipeg’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions come from transportation. TMP50 is calling for 55% of all Winnipeg’s transportation modes by 2050 come from sustainable modes (transit, car share, cycling, walking) and an 80% decline of 2011 GHG emission transportation levels. Meanwhile, the city wants cycling and walking to make up 14% of all trips made by 2030.
However, our combined active transportation infrastructure (388km, the lowest among all major Canadian cities) and transit routes (2,188km) are only one-third of the total roads network (8,300 km) and fails to address the 14% active transportation target.
Add to the mix safety concerns for pedestrians and cyclists (Winnipeg is last in cycling and pedestrian safety in Canada), and improving social equity only adds to moving the TMP50 vital to Winnipeg.
Personally, during the seminars, I did appreciate some of the suggestions by city planners and officials to make our future transportation more sustainable, safe, and equitable.
The planners proposed a complete street framework that involves re-thinking our streets to include safe and sustainable transportation options for everyone. A comprehensive streets framework may involve redesigning a road with six vehicle lanes, two for parking. This would change to a sidewalk, protected bike lane, bus stops on concrete islands, one lane for on-street parking, two travel vehicle lanes, and a flexible lane. Currently, Sherbrook Street offers Winnipeg’s best example.
Other suggestions included:
– Bike share programs
– Car sharing
– Bike parking at transit stops
– Road safety programs
– Factor social equity in public transit decisions
– Winter maintenance of active transportation infrastructure
– Bicycle lanes on significant corridors (re: Portage Avenue, Henderson Highway).
While city planners and officials did provide some good ideas, others were questionable. These included Michigan Lefts (not a political term, but a glorified U-turn), connecting roadways in new developments, and more roundabouts?
While I appreciate what city planners were thinking about on the roadside, most participants felt that we could go beyond just adding more roads. Ideas participants would like to see include:
- Old bridges transformed for active transportation use
- Improving transit fare schemes making it more accessible for lower-income citizens, cyclists, etc.
- Reducing bicycle theft
- Improve downtown cycling safety downtown
These ideas will enhance TMP50 more than Michigan lefts in making our cities’ transportation system.
We can’t keep building new roads for building roads as it’s not either financially or environmentally sustainable. Sure, this plan has problems, including the need to rely less on road development and lengthy targets in switching to more sustainable transportation modes. However, TMP50 seems like an actual start in transforming our lacklustre transportation system into a modern, climate-resistant, socially equitable one.
And guess what? Winnipeggers want to change when given better ways to move around. Did you know that 66.7% of respondents said they want to go to more sustainable and active transportation options. Meanwhile, 45% of respondents to a Bike Winnipeg /CAA Manitoba 2018 poll said they would be willing to cycle more if conditions were right. Why? Because they know it’s good for their finances, health, and the environment. They WANT to change. People realize the current way we get around here is not working. As the city continues to grow, The need to rely less on motor vehicle use will become clear as we prioritize its citizens’ needs.
There will be a lot of work to complete this and make sure it’s not just another report that collects dust. Ongoing education by city officials, planners, and the public is critical going through phase two and the following discussion phase next year. Engaging our city councillors and potential mayoral candidates heading into next year’s municipal election is vital to let them know we want this done within the next 5-10 years, NOT 30. Wildcards including a change provincial government, higher interest rates, and a possible 2031 Pan Am Games bid could impact the plan.
TMP50 has its critics on both sides. Some will say this is too radical. Others say this does not go far enough (including myself). However, this is the best plan to get something done to improve our public and active transportation infrastructure. Too many studies and reports have collected dust, and we don’t have time to waste it. Let’s get it done.